Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 14 April 2023 Ias Banenge
Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 14 April 2023
Contents
- All Should Get Bail, Not a Few
- Working Women in India: A Catch-22
All Should Get Bail, Not a Few
Context
An individual who was charged in the Lakhimpur Kheri case, in which eight people died, recently received interim bail.
o Everyone accused of the same or lesser offences must be treated equally.
Relevance:
GS paper-2: Structure, organization and functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary – Ministries and Departments of the Government.
READ MORE- National Mission in Interdisciplinary Cyber-Physical Systems (NM-ICPS) Ias Banenge
Mains Question
What do you think about the idea that everyone, not just the privileged few, should be subject to bail instead of jail? Observation (150 words)
A Basic Principle of Personal Liberty: Bail, Not Jail
- Justice Krishna Iyer stated that the “basic rule” is “Bail, not Jail” almost fifty years ago.However, this fundamental principle of personal liberty has consistently been disregarded, resulting in the incarceration of common people, human rights activists, writers, educators, and even press reporters.
- According to data provided by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), 4,27,165 of the total 5,54,034 prisoners were incarcerated as of December 31, 2021, meaning that more than four lakh accused were detained without bail while awaiting the start or conclusion of their trial.
The Root Cause of the Resistance to Release:
- The higher judiciary is overrun with bail requests as a result of reluctance at the grassroots levels to grant bail, according to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), who made this statement in November 2022 while speaking at an event hosted by the Bar Council of India.
- Despite Justice Iyer’s unambiguous statement from more than 50 years ago and the Supreme Court’s thorough instructions on arrest and bail in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, the basic principle of bail is frequently disregarded or rejected by the courts. In addition, even the Supreme Court is currently dealing with hundreds of bail applications and a sizable number of habeas corpus petitions.
- The CJI stated in the Arnab Goswami case that “deprivation of liberty for a single day is a day too many,” so these are significant numbers.
- The judiciary must show more empathy in order to address the problems that people facing trials face.
- The need for greater transparency within the judicial system is also urgent.
- The courts should think about ordering daily proceedings to speed up the legal process and avoid prison overcrowding. This will help the case move along smoothly and allow people to get justice quickly.
Is Bail in the Case of Ashish Mishra a Priority Over Safety?
- Ashish Mishra’s recent bail hearing has rekindled concerns about how bail is applied in the Indian judicial system. The police took a while to find him despite the brutality of the crime.
- Mishra wasn’t actually arrested until a Public Interest Litigation was brought before the Supreme Court to address the police’s inaction and voice concerns about the impartiality of the investigation.
- One judge on the Allahabad High Court’s Lucknow bench granted the accused’s request for bail.
- The Supreme Court was then contacted, but the bench criticised the high court for failing to take important factors into account, such as the seriousness of the offence and the likelihood that the accused would tamper with evidence or flee from justice.In the end, the Supreme Court revoked the bail, sending a strong message about the value of objectivity in the legal system.The Supreme Court is still considering Ashish Mishra’s request for standard bail. However, the accused has been given provisional bail for the following reasons:
- To start, he has been detained for more than a year.
- Secondly, it is anticipated that the trial will last at least five years.
- Mishra wasn’t actually arrested until a Public Interest Litigation was brought before the Supreme Court to address the police’s inaction and voice concerns about the impartiality of the investigation.
- Many people were surprised by this decision because the same bench had previously rejected the bail application on valid and justified grounds.
- Although bail cannot be refused indefinitely, it shouldn’t be given priority over the safety of society and the prompt conclusion of the court case.
Conclusion
- The basic rule, “Bail, not jail,” is the principle of bail, and it is past time for the Indian judicial system to uphold this rule.
Working Women in India: A Catch-22
Context
Time-use studies show the need to address gender bias in work-life balance as India strives for a women-led development model.
Relevance:
GS Paper-1: Role of women and women’s organization, population and associated issues, poverty and developmental issues, urbanization, their problems and their remedies
Mains Question
What role does addressing gender bias in work-life balance play in India’s quest for women-led development? Talk aabout (150 words)
The Value of Leisure Time:
- Leisure gives people the time and space they need to unwind, recharge, and partake in enjoyable pursuits.
- It is a crucial component of human existence and is linked to better mental and physical outcomes.
- Despite the value of leisure, discussions about work, employment, and labour force participation frequently take precedence.
- Work overload and job demands can have a negative impact on women’s health in the form of burnout and reduced job satisfaction, according to a study that was published in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.
- People can disconnect from their daily obligations and recharge during their free time.
- It encourages stress resistance, elevates mood, and helps people form social connections.
Working women and Leisure Time Inequality:
- Finding time for leisure activities is a significant challenge for working women. In addition to their obligations in the workplace, they frequently shoulder an excessive number of domestic duties, such as childcare and housework.
- As a result of this double burden, women may find it difficult to find time for leisure and other self-care activities.
- According to an Oxford University study, women perform 60% more unpaid work than men, including domestic and caregiving tasks.
- A study that used information from a Time Use Survey (TUS) conducted by the Union ministry of statistics and programme implementation in 2019 made clear the impact on working women’s free time.
- The population’s time spent on nine main categories of activities was measured by the survey. 257,677 people between the ages of 21 and 59 made up the sample for the analysis, of which 131,543 women and 126,134 men.
- The analysis showed that compared to working men and women who don’t spend any time on work-related activities, women who work spend significantly less time on leisure activities.
- While working men spent 12% of their time on leisure activities, working women only spent 8.7% of their typical day doing so.
Taking on the Challenge:
- By making policy changes that take into account the dual burden of domestic and professional responsibilities that women bear, the gap in leisure time for working men and women can be narrowed.
- Expanding women’s leisure opportunities may have significant positive effects on their health, their families, and the economy.
- Understanding the value of leisure time in people’s lives and the difficulties experienced by specific groups, like working women, lays the groundwork for more equitable policies and societal norms.
- Offering working women more flexibility in their work arrangements is one way to lessen the pressure on them.
- Working women can better manage their conflicting commitments with flexible work schedules or remote work options.
- Employers might, for instance, permit working mothers to work from home or provide part-time employment opportunities. By enhancing employee satisfaction and decreasing turnover, these options also benefit the employer.
- The provision of accessible and reasonably priced childcare services is another policy change that can increase women’s access to leisure time.
- Women would be able to pursue their careers and leisure pursuits without having to give up either if there were access to high-quality and dependable childcare services.
- Putting money into onsite childcare services can help working women feel less responsible for running the home, freeing up time for leisure.
Government’s role:
- Governments can promote the division of household duties between men and women. Women frequently shoulder the majority of domestic duties, which results in time shortages and limited free time.
- Men need to be encouraged and supported to share equally in household duties, which calls for the development of policies aimed at promoting gender equality.Paternity leave is one such policy that may encourage fathers to assume more responsibility for the upbringing of their children.
Conclusion:
- Discussions of work and labour force participation frequently overlook leisure time, which is an important aspect of human life. Working women struggle greatly to balance work and home responsibilities, which leaves little time for leisure.
- This issue can be resolved by implementing policy changes that support gender equality at the household level, flexible work schedules, and easily accessible childcare.
- Policymakers can enhance the well-being of people, families, and the economy by acknowledging the value of leisure time in people’s lives and the need for more leisure time for working women.
- India needs to make investments in policies that allow everyone to have leisure time and space, especially those who have excessive demands placed on their time.
- By doing this, it can produce a more just and healthy society that encourages everyone’s wellbeing and happiness.
